The following lists palliative care research primarily conducted by Australian research groups. The list is based on application of the CareSearch search filter for palliative care to identify articles held within the PubMed database and corresponding to the strongest evidence. Articles have been selected based on relevance and new articles are added on a weekly basis.
Whilst not an exhaustive list, the aim is to keep the community informed by providing a snapshot of recent research findings and planned studies in the Australian setting.
Chi J, Krysinska K, Andriessen K.
Abstract: Experiencing the death of a loved one is a stressful and disruptive event that can have short-term and long-term detrimental effects on the grief, mental health, and social functioning of the bereaved individuals. Grief camps represent a relatively novel form of support. However, little is known about their effectiveness. The systematic review (PROSPERO: #CRD42024547094) adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and aimed to investigate the effectiveness of grief camps on the grief and psychosocial functioning of participants. Searches in six databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL) identified 31 relevant studies published between 1991 and 2022. Narrative synthesis of the study findings indicated a positive impact of grief camps on the grief and psychosocial functioning of bereaved individuals, and participants' feedback indicated that grief camps are an acceptable intervention. Further research in various locations and across different age groups may broaden our understanding of the effects of grief camps.
Javanparast S, Tieman J.
Background: Palliative care needs rounds have been introduced to improve palliative and end-of-life care in residential aged care homes. As part of the Australian Government initiative 'Comprehensive Palliative Care in Aged Care Measure', needs rounds have been trialled in seven metropolitan and fifteen regional/rural aged care homes in South Australia. This qualitative study examined stakeholders' perspectives about potential values and factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation and sustainability of needs rounds.
Methods: A qualitative approach was employed by using individual interviews and focus groups. Semi-structured interviews (n = 13) were conducted with executives, project team members and staff from both sites. Additionally, four focus groups were facilitated in regional/rural sites (n = 10) to further unpack specific elements of needs rounds' model that were tailored based on their needs. The interview and focus group data were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were transferred into the qualitative data management software NVivo (version 14) for coding and analysis. Guided by a coding framework, thematic analysis was undertaken.
Results: Participants found palliative care needs rounds valuable in providing a structured approach to improving palliative care planning and enhancing workforce knowledge and confidence in identifying and managing care towards the end of life. Access to telehealth facilitated needs rounds participation, especially in regional/rural areas. Comparing the nurse practitioner with the medical consultant led needs rounds revealed that there is no 'one size fits all' approach with advantages and disadvantages for each model. Successful implementation of such a model depends on the context within which needs rounds are implemented such as organisational needs, capacity and infrastructure, geography, and resources. Organisational commitment to palliative care, preparedness for change, strong leadership and financial support, and access to online platforms were noted as key factors enabling successful implementation of needs rounds.
Conclusions: Palliative care needs rounds can contribute to improving organisational culture and workforce knowledge in palliative and end-of-life care. Policy commitment and financial support to adopt and tailor palliative care needs rounds that meet local needs are highly recommended.
Wand A, Karageorge A, Zeng Y, Browne R, Sands M, Kanareck D, et al.
Purpose: To examine the attitudes, experiences, and perceived facilitators and barriers to Advance Care Planning (ACP), of older people with schizophrenia and other psychotic illness and their carers.
Methods: Older people with a psychotic illness and carers were recruited from public mental health services in Sydney, Australia. Semi-structured interviews to explore attitudes, experiences, and perceived barriers and facilitators to ACP were conducted by an external clinician. Consumers' medical, psychiatric and drug health diagnoses were recorded and they completed cognitive and symptom rating scales. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcripts of interviews, within an interpretive description framework.
Results: Thematic saturation was achieved with 12 consumers and 5 carers. Emergent themes from consumer interviews were (i) 'What is ACP?'; (ii) 'I have not done ACP because…..'; (iii) 'I want to do ACP'; (iv) 'If I was to do ACP I would need..'; and (v) 'Mental health clinicians have the skills to help me with ACP'. Carer themes included (i) 'We do not participate in ACP', (ii) 'I want to participate in ACP', and (iii) 'Key clinician skills are needed'. There was convergence of themes from both groups.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that older people with a psychotic illness can express views regarding ACP, despite ongoing symptoms of psychosis, cognitive impairment and mild-moderate severity of illness. The emergent themes highlight opportunities to intervene to overcome barriers to ACP, including education for both participant groups and clinicians, practical considerations and the need for all to collaborate, including with primary care.
Last updated 30 April 2024