Delirium

Key Messages

  • Despite its prevalence in palliative care, delirium is underdiagnosed, especially hypoactive delirium. [1-3] Diagnosis is important for management, prognostication, and in order to counsel families. [4,5] The onset of delirium can be associated with a worsening prognosis. [5-7]
  • Delirium in palliative care patients can be a potentially reversible condition. [8]
  • Delirium is more common in patients with previous cognitive impairment or dementia. [9]
  • Delirium causes significant distress to patients, families and staff [10] and makes it challenging to assess and treat other problems such as pain or depression. [5]
  • Symptom fluctuation means assessment should be part of routine care and is most accurately assessed if it is monitored regularly rather than intermittently.
  • There are many validated tools which can be used including the commonly used Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) [11,12]
  • There is often more than one predisposing and precipitating factor for delirium in palliative care. [8]
  • There is limited evidence to support the use of, barbiturates or phenothiazines in the treatment of delirium in palliative care. [8]
  • Reducing factors that contribute to delirium, such as room/environment/care setting changes or day/night disruption and minimising the medication burden wherever possible, with special attention to psychoactive drugs can reduce the incidence of delirium. [8]
  • Educating and counselling caregivers is an important aspect of managing patients at risk for delirium, or when delirium is diagnosed.

  

  

  

PubMed Searches

Delirium
Free full text only All citations About these searches
Review collection

Evidence Summary

Definition and Prevalence

Delirium is defined as a condition of disturbed consciousness, with reduced ability to focus, sustain or shift attention. The DSM 5 [13]- revised diagnostic criteria for delirium require:

  • disturbance of consciousness with a reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention
  • altered cognition or a perceptual disturbance (which is not better accounted for by dementia),
  • symptoms develop over hours to days and tend to fluctuate during the course of the day, and
  • evidence of an aetiological cause for the delirium.

Delirium may be

  • hyperactive (presenting with agitation, hyperarousal, and restlessness), or
  • hypoactive (presenting with drowsiness, lethargy and reduced levels of arousal), or
  • a mixed pattern in which the symptoms fluctuate between hyperactive and hypoactive. [14]

Delirium is extremely common in palliative care patients, with estimates that over 40 percent of patients will experience delirium and the prevalence increasing to over 80 per cent at the end of life. [15-17] Toward the end of life delirium, when combined with agitation may also be referred to as terminal restlessness. Delirium is an independent predictor of mortality. [5,6,15,18]

Assessment

Delirium is underdiagnosed, due in part, to the difficulty in assessing it. [3,15] It remains challenging to diagnose, particularly in children [19] and older people. [20] Hypoactive delirium in particular is under-diagnosed and is the most frequent subtype of delirium in palliative care settings. [1] In a recent systematic review an issue identified with screening or diagnostic tools for delirium were the level of training required to use them and the length of time it takes to administer them. [21] Some of the more commonly used screening tools are the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), which requires specific training for optimal use, the Delirium Rating Scale, which appears to work best in older patients, and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, may be best used to measure delirium severity. [12,22] Another review also recommended the Observational Scale of Level of Arousal (OSLO) and the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) as easy to use and appropriate for use in older people. [21] Assessment of delirium is difficult in children and there is low level evidence to support assessment tools for this group. [19]

Terminal restlessness is a cluster of symptoms and perhaps is a poorly understood and overly used term in the palliative care community. Most often described are a combination of agitation and altered mental state, occurring close to the end of life and may be referred to as agitated delirium. [8] There is no agreed definition of this condition. Its relationship with delirium, and its management and potential for reversibility are poorly understood. Assessment must include a consideration of alternative diagnoses. The differential diagnosis for this symptom complex may include: delirium, poorly controlled physical symptoms such as pain, itch, urinary retention or faecal impaction in a patient who is obtunded; akathisia, myoclonus and other movement disorders; partial complex seizures; paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis; and PTSD or other psychotic disorder.

Treatment

Delirium may be reversible, although there is evidence that in some patients it can be persistent [23] and associated with longer term cognitive problems. [24] Much of the evidence about prognosis and treatment of delirium comes from the aged care and critical care literature. However, the focus of care in these populations may be different from that in palliative care, particularly in very advanced disease. [5] In palliative care patients, delirium is frequently multifactorial, and when the main precipitant is irreversible, or due to other factors (for example patient wishes, risk or burden of the interventions) the decision may be made not to pursue active investigation.

Factors which should be considered as possible contributors to delirium in a palliative care patient, and treated as appropriate, include:

  • Infection
  • Metabolic and biochemical disorders (eg, renal failure, hypercalcaemia, hyponatraemia, dehydration, hypoxia, hypercapnia)
  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Structural cerebral disease (eg, primary or secondary cancer, leptomeningeal disease, radiotherapy to the brain)
  • Medications (eg, psychoactive medications such as benzodiazepines, opioids, corticosteroids, antidepressants, or medications with an anticholinergic effect)
  • Drug withdrawal (eg, alcohol, benzodiazepines, nicotine)
  • Environmental (hospital admission and associated procedures, uncorrected sensory deficits eg, vision and hearing).

When delirium is determined as a cause of distress in a dying patient, sedation may be the appropriate goal of treatment, and antipsychotics and benzodiazepines are currently the mainstay of therapy. [8] See pharmacological management. Non pharmacological approaches to delirium in the last days of life can always be implemented.

Delirium can have a distressing effect on family and carers. The high levels of stress experienced by the family of patients with delirium may be exacerbated by the potential irreversibility of the condition and the concern that the patient may die before the delirium abates. [18] Providing carers with information about the causes and potential course of delirium can be useful and reduce distress. [18] Caregivers also found information about how to act around people with delirium useful. [18]

Treatment of delirium is addressed in greater detail in sub-sections on:
Pharmacological Management
Non-pharmacological Management

Practice Implications

  • Delirium is underdiagnosed, despite its prevalence in palliative care. [1,8] The symptoms of delirium can mask the presence of other conditions, such as pain.
  • Assessment for symptoms of delirium should be part of routine care. It is most accurately assessed if it is monitored regularly rather than being screened for intermittently. There are a number of validated tools which can be used including the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) [15,21,25]
  • Pharmacological management of delirium is at present based on expert opinion and, on that basis, low dose haloperidol can be recommended as first line treatment. [16]
  • There is evidence for the impact of environmental factors on cognitively vulnerable patients. [20] It is important to consider clinical practices and features of the palliative care environment which may increase the risk or severity of delirium, or worsen disorientation, and to minimise these (eg, room and staff changes, day / night disruption, avoidable immobilisation and catheterisation, making sure patients have their hearing aids and glasses, and so on).
  • Educating and counselling caregivers is an important aspect of managing patients at risk for delirium, or when delirium is diagnosed. [18,26]

Evidence Gap

  • It is unclear whether hyperactive and hypoactive delirium have the same pathophysiology, prognostic significance and responses to treatment. [14] The pathophysiology, assessment and management of terminal restlessness has not been well studied.
  • Multicomponent intervention studies modify the environment to prevent or reduce the duration of delirium. [20] Whether this approach is likely to be effective in palliative care settings has not yet been studied. However it is likely that the hospitalised elderly population in which it has shown benefit has similarities with many patients in the palliative setting.
  • Placebo-controlled trials are still needed to answer the question of whether and which antipsychotics are effective in the treatment of delirium, which targeted symptoms they impact on, whether they improve delirium resolution, and how they should be titrated. [17]
  • Education programs to improve the identification and management of delirium are being trialled with some positive outcomes. [26]
  • Trials of the impact of melatonin on delirium in intensive care patients are underway and may provide a new direction for research in palliative care. [27]

 

  1. Spiller JA, Keen JC. Hypoactive delirium: assessing the extent of the problem for inpatient specialist palliative care. Palliat Med. 2006 Jan;20(1):17-23.
  2. Steis MR, Fick DM. Are nurses recognising delirium? A systematic review. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008 Sep;34(9):40-8.
  3. Boland JW, Kabir M, Bush SH, Spiller JA, Johnson MJ, Agar M, et al. Delirium management by palliative medicine specialists: a survey from the association for palliative medicine of Great Britain and Ireland. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 4. pii: bmjspcare-2018-001586. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001586. [Epub ahead of print]
  4. Schuurmans MJ, Duursma SA, Shortridge-Baggett LM. Early recognition of delirium: review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Nov;10(6):721-9.
  5. Leonard M, Agar M, Mason C, Lawlor P. Delirium issues in palliative care settings. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Sep;65(3):289-98.
  6. Gagnon PR. Treatment of delirium in supportive and palliative care. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2008 Mar;2(1):60-6.
  7. Hatherill S, Flisher AJ. Delirium in children and adolescents: A systematic review of the literature. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Apr;68(4):337-44. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
  8. Skelton L, Guo P. Evaluating the effects of the pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to manage delirium symptoms in palliative care patients: systematic review. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2019 Sep 3. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000458. [Epub ahead of print]
  9. Fick DM, Agostini JV, Inouye SK. Delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Oct;50(10):1723-32.
  10. Breitbart W, Gibson C, Tremblay A. The delirium experience: delirium recall and delirium-related distress in hospitalized patients with cancer, their spouses/caregivers, and their nurses. Psychosomatics. 2002 May-Jun;43(3):183-94.
  11. Hjermstad MJ, Loge JH, Kaasa S. Methods for assessment of cognitive failure and delirium in palliative care patients: implications for practice and research. Palliat Med. 2004 Sep;18(6):494-506.
  12. Jones RN, Cizginer S, Pavlech L, Albuquerque A, Daiello LA, Dharmarajan K, et al. Assessment of Instruments for Measurement of Delirium Severity: A Systematic Review. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):231-239. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6975.
  13. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington: APA; 1994.
  14. de Rooij SE, Schuurmans SJ, van der Mast RC, Levi M. Clinical subtypes of delirium and their relevance for daily clinical practice: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;20(7):609-15.
  15. Bush SH, Tierney S, Lawlor PG. Clinical Assessment and Management of Delirium in the Palliative Care Setting. Drugs. 2017 Oct;77(15):1623-1643. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0804-3.
  16. Bush SH, Lawlor PG, Ryan K, Centeno C, Lucchesi M, Kanji S, et al. Delirium in adult cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv143-iv165. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy147.
  17. Johnson RJ 3rd. A research study review of effectiveness of treatments for psychiatric conditions common to end-stage cancer patients: needs assessment for future research and an impassioned plea. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1651-9.
  18. Finucane AM, Lugton J, Kennedy C, Spiller JA. The experiences of caregivers of patients with delirium, and their role in its management in palliative care settings: an integrative literature review. Psychooncology. 2017 Mar;26(3):291-300. Epub 2016 May 1.
  19. Gangopadhyay M, Smith H, Pao M, Silver G, Deepmala D, De Souza C. Development of the Vanderbilt Assessment for Delirium in Infants and Children to Standardize Pediatric Delirium Assessment By Psychiatrists. Psychosomatics. 2017 Jul - Aug;58(4):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
  20. Hshieh TT, Yang T, Gartaganis SL, Yue J, Inouye SK. Hospital Elder Life Program: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Effectiveness. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;26(10):1015-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
  21. Quispel-Aggenbach DWP, Holtman GA, Zwartjes HAHT, Zuidema SU, Luijendijk HJ. Attention, arousal and other rapid bedside screening instruments for delirium in older patients: a systematic review of test accuracy studies. Age Ageing. 2018 Sep 1;47(5):644-653. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy058.
  22. De J, Wand AP. Delirium Screening: A Systematic Review of Delirium Screening Tools in Hospitalized Patients. Gerontologist. 2015 Dec;55(6):1079-99. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv100. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
  23. Dasgupta M, Hillier LM. Factors associated with prolonged delirium: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 May;22(3):373-94. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
  24. Cole MG, Ciampi A, Belzile E, Zhong L. Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: a systematic review of frequency and prognosis. Age Ageing. 2009 Jan;38(1):19-26. Epub 2008 Nov 18. 
  25. Wong CL, Holroyd-Leduc J, Simel DL, Straus SE. Does this patient have delirium?: value of bedside instruments. JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):779-86.
  26. Coyle MA, Chang HC, Burns P, Traynor V. Impact of Interactive Education on Health Care Practitioners and Older Adults at Risk of Delirium A Literature Review. J Gerontol Nurs. 2018 Aug 1;44(8):41-48. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20180626-02.
  27. Foster J, Burry LD, Thabane L, Choong K, Menon K, Duffett M, et al. Melatonin and melatonin agonists to prevent and treat delirium in critical illness: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;5(1):199.

 

Last updated 29 October 2019