Evidenced-based models of rural palliative care

Evidenced-based models of rural palliative care

An article written by Claire Marshall, PhD candidate at University of Technology, Sydney.

Almost half (45%) of the world’s population lives in rural areas, yet their access to quality palliative care is limited. [1-6] Barriers that impact access to and quality of rural palliative care include challenging terrain and a wide population distribution; challenges recruiting and educating local health care staff; limited access to specialist services and specialist clinicians (across all disciplines); and fragmented service delivery. [5]

Most people with palliative care needs want to maximise the time they spend at home and in their community. [2,3] To achieve this, patients and families need well-developed health care services [7], that includes 24-hour, 7-day-per-week access to palliative care services. [8] Rural primary care clinicians are usually well equipped to provide palliative care to patients and families with straightforward and predictable needs, while specialist palliative care clinicians/services are best placed to provide care to people with complex needs. [9] However, it is unclear which rural models of palliative care, which combine access to primary care and specialist palliative care services/clinicians, exist or work best.

We performed a systematic review to collect and synthesise the highest quality available quantitative evidence of tested rural models of palliative care to clarify which ones have demonstrated improved patient outcomes. We searched PubMed, CINAHL and Embase and identified 9508 articles. Following the review process, 15 articles [10-24] reporting on 14 studies met the criteria for inclusion. We chose the World Health Organization Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions Framework (WHO ICCC Framework) [25] as the conceptual framework, to assist with classifying the data. This framework uses 18 micro-, meso-, and macro- level elements necessary to develop models of care and health care services which address chronic conditions, including palliative care. [25] We used a narrative synthesis approach [26] and the PRISMA statement [27] to guide the reporting of results.

The included studies took place in rural areas of Australia [12,14,15,17-19,23], USA [10,11,21,24], Canada [13], Japan [16,20] and Finland [22] and involved 1831 adult and paediatric participants. The included studies used several different methods to deliver care, for example: GP-led end of life care; care coordination; complex care planning; telehealth appointments with specialist palliative care physicians; and in home respite. Most studies measured their impact by assessing changes to rates of presentation to the emergency department, place of death taking place in the site of the patients choice; changes to hospital length of stay, and changes in symptom management and quality of life scores. Using the WHO ICCC Framework [25] to identify common elements across these models, we identified the following which can optimise rural palliative care:

  • A well-coordinated multidisciplinary team approach, using care planning.
  • Care that is led or overseen by clinicians with specialist palliative care expertise.
  • Care that is integrated across all involved health care providers, using methods to share patient information.
  • Timely access to specialist palliative care clinicians and information to help patients navigate their end-of-life journey.
  • Access to funding for innovative model of care design, program evaluation, and information technology infrastructure.

Using the WHO ICCC Framework [25] revealed a strong focus on micro- level elements, partial achievement of meso- level elements, and poor achievement of macro- level elements; and a lack of collaboration between study sites and macro-level departments such as governing bodies and policy makers.

Going forward, more robust research needs to take place to test model of care interventions. Rural telecommunication infrastructure needs to be improved to support access to virtual care options, and health care policy needs to be modified to align with these recommendations to enable changes to take place on a larger scale.

 

References

  1. Bakitas MA, Elk R, Astin M, Ceronsky L, Clifford KN, Dionne-Odom JN, et al. Systematic review of palliative care in the rural setting. Cancer Control.  2015;22(4):450-64.
  2. Rainsford S, Macleod RD, Glasgow NJ. Place of death in rural palliative care: A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2016 Sep;30(8):745-63.
  3. Robinson CA, Pesut B, Bottorff JL. Issues in rural palliative care: Views from the countryside. J Rural Health. 2010;26(1):78-84.
  4. Robinson CA, Pesut B, Bottorff JL, Mowry A, Broughton S, Fyles G. Rural palliative care: A comprehensive review. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(3):5.
  5. Tedder T, Elliott L, Lewis K. Analysis of common barriers to rural patients utilizing hospice and palliative care services: An integrated literature review. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(6):356-62.
  6. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420) (4.71MB pdf). New York: United Nations; 2019 [cited 2023 Sep 19].
  7. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson IJ. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: A systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12:7.
  8. Phillips JL, Davidson PM, Newton PJ, DiGiacomo M. Supporting patients and their caregivers after-hours at the end of life: The role of telephone support. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;36(1):11-21.
  9. Palliative Care Australia. Palliative care service development guidelines (340kb pdf). Griffith, ACT: PCA; 2018 [cited 2023 Sep 19].
  10. Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, Balan S, Barnett KN, Brokaw FC, et al. The project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial to improve palliative care for rural patients with advanced cancer: Baseline findings, methodological challenges, and solutions. Palliat Support Care. 2009;7(1):75-86.
  11. Bakitas MA, Tosteson TD, Li Z, Lyons KD, Hull JG, Li Z, et al. Early versus delayed initiation of concurrent palliative oncology care: Patient outcomes in the ENABLE III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(13):1438-45.
  12. Barrett M, Wheatland B, Haselby P, Larson A, Kristjanson L, Whyatt D. Palliative respite services using nursing staff reduces hospitalization of patients and improves acceptance among carers. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2009;15(8):389-95.
  13. Hebert MA, Brant R, Hailey D, Van Der Pol M. Potential and readiness for video-visits in rural palliative homecare: Results of a multi-method study in Canada. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(3_suppl):43-5.
  14. Hollingworth S, Zhang J, Vaikuntam BP, Jackson C, Mitchell G. Case conference primary-secondary care planning at end of life can reduce the cost of hospitalisations. BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Sep 23;15(1):84.
  15. Jiang B, Bills M, Poon P. Integrated telehealth-assisted home-based specialist palliative care in rural Australia: A feasibility study. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;29(1):50-7.
  16. Kentaro K, Tomoko S, Hidenobu K, Yasuhiro O, Shin Y, Hidefumi I, et al. Cost of physician-led home visit care (Zaitaku care) compared with hospital care at the end of life in Japan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):40.
  17. Mitchell G, Melaku M, Moss A, Chaille G, Makoni B, Lewis L, et al. Evaluation of a commissioned end-of-life care service in Australian aged care facilities. Prog Palliat Care. 2022;30(4):229-37.
  18. Mitchell G, Zhang J, Burridge L, Senior H, Miller E, Young S, et al. Case conferences between general practitioners and specialist teams to plan end of life care of people with end stage heart failure and lung disease: An exploratory pilot study. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13:24.
  19. Nguyen M, Ng Ying Kin S, Shum E, Wann A, Tamjid B, Sahu A, et al. Anticancer therapy within the last 30 days of life: Results of an audit and re-audit cycle from an Australian regional cancer centre. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1):1-10.
  20. Ohta R, Ryu Y. Improvement in palliative care quality in rural nursing homes through information and communication technology-driven interprofessional collaboration. Rural Remote Health. 2021;21(2):6450.
  21. Orsak G, McGaha P, Brandon P, Swan A, Singh KP. A longitudinal pilot study for examining symptom reduction in patients with cancer in a palliative care program: A primarily rural Northeast Texas population. Hosp Top. 2019;97(2):54-9.
  22. Surakka LK, Peake MM, Kiljunen MM, Mäntyselkä P, Lehto JT. Preplanned participation of paramedics in end-of-life care at home: A retrospective cohort study. Palliat Med. 2021;35(3):584-91.
  23. van de Mortel TF, Marr K, Burmeister E, Koppe H, Ahern C, Walsh R, et al. Reducing avoidable admissions in rural community palliative care: A pilot study of care coordination by General Practice registrars. Aust J Rural Health. 2017;25(3):141-7.
  24. Weaver MS, Shostrom VK, Neumann ML, Robinson JE, Hinds PS. Homestead together: Pediatric palliative care telehealth support for rural children with cancer during home‐based end‐of‐life care. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68(4):e28921.
  25. World Health Organization (WHO). Innovative care for chronic conditions: Building blocks for action. Geneva: Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, WHO; 2002 [cited 2023 Sep 19].
  26. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews (631kb pdf). 2006 [cited 2023 Sep 19].
  27. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71.

Author

 


Claire Marshall

PhD candidate

University of Technology Sydney

 

Print
906 views

Leave a comment

This form collects your name, email, IP address and content so that we can keep track of the comments placed on the website. For more info check our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use where you will get more info on where, how and why we store your data.
Add comment

The views and opinions expressed in Palliative Perspectives are those of the authors and are not necessarily supported by CareSearch, Flinders University and/or the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care.